|
Peace meditations and Kosovo
by Palden Jenkins |
It's indeed true and demonstrated (at least within our community of
believers) that a dangerous situation in and around Iraq was successfully
headed off by the use of meditation earlier this year. Yet the problem
around Iraq is still not resolved, and in this the outcomes of the
meditation might be in question: there are still deadly nukes and
biological weapons in Iraq, and these can still be used in a variety of
contexts (watch out for Iran and Turkey), and the West has not learned its
own lesson from all this either. From my own inner meditative-psychic
researches I've discovered that Saddam Hussein is not such a bad guy as he
is commonly demonised to be, yet he's also not the world's wisest man either
- and he can still play havoc with millions of people. So, with regard to
the current problem, Kosovo/Serbia, the focus perhaps needs to be on sorting
out the problems on both or all sides of the equation, and not just using
the occasion to click into default protester mode or rigid new age
peace-ideology, and just to rail at capitalists, military men and media
types that's just one side of the equation! The fact is, the Serbs are
committing crimes against humanity, and there's some serious malignancy
going on.
The material you sent out from Jan Oberg in Sweden (entitled "Human Rights
and Peace Forums in Conflict Areas" from Transnational Foundation TFF
tff@transnational.org) is valuable, important and valid, and I agree with
it and work with this stuff myself. However, I'd suggest we're talking
about different things here, and distinctions need making. This is like
the difference between complementary therapies and invasive surgery/heavy
pharmaceutical treatment. The former is preferable to the latter, since it
addresses the fundamentals more properly and brings more fullsome healing.
However, the latter is valuable when it is too late to apply the former -
sometimes, if a cancer has gone critical, surgery, radiation and chemicals
are the only known solution.
The same goes for social peacebuilding versus military intervention. With
military intervention, as with surgery, the diagnosis needs to be good, and
the work done excellent and appropriate, and sometimes, in an emergency, you
have to just act on the knowledge and skills you have, without knowing if
it's the best option in retrospect because disaster is, at the time, the
only other perceptible option. The lesson to be drawn from this is that
full complementary therapy needs applying from the first moment the symptoms
arise, not when they've gone super-acute and deadly and the big fault of
the international community is that it has avoided the issues up to now and
thus allowed military intervention to become almost inevitable. However,
since we're in the situation we're now in, my reservation is that meditative
action, especially action which perhaps rigidly is visualising peace at
any cost, might not be the sole or best option. I would remind people
that, aside from bombing, armies are good in humanitarian work because
they're trained to achieve results and overcome obstacles and even if no
shots are fired in Kosovo, and even if the Serbs pull back and drop their
case, there's a lot of emergency work to do there, and imminent deaths are
likely without bombing happening.
So please watch your judgements, people! Don't project your
peace-preferences on a situation in a way which might itself be one-sided or
even narrow! Peace-work is important and right, but we needed to think
about this at an earlier stage, when such healing was perhaps more valid
than it now is, at the last minute. To me, it's not a question of military
intervention or no military intervention: it's a question of the skill and
motivation with which it's done. Perhaps it's better to put spiritual
support into the right use of intervention, instead of belatedly
complicating things. Perhaps it's also worth getting a prejudice out of the
way: who's to say that military action is always bad? And who has a
really acceptable, demonstratedly-effective substitute? I see few hands
shooting up with good answers to this.
We have to remember another matter. There's one thing, which is the
confusions society gets itself into fear, distrust, polarisation and so
on. There's another too, which is that a small number of serious assholes
still have a big effect in the world. Because we humans are all trained to
default to negative (fear) than to positive, it just takes one Milosevic to
stand up and activate terrible negativity amongst people who, in themselves,
are basically okay people. Yes, most Serbs are fine folks. This doesn't
happen on the positive side: if one person stands up and spouts wisdom,
everyone says "Very well and good, but....".
I do a lot of remote-viewing meditation work, and I've visited many world
leaders in this way. From this, one thing I can say about Saddam Hussein
is that he has his faults, but as a soul he seems to be an interesting guy
with a valid point to make, and a good-hearted side to him as well as a lot
of paranoia, pain and dangerous motives (mostly unconscious). However,
Slobodan Milosevic, in my experience, is an empty soul. He has nothing
inside him except a heart of glass in my judgement and experience, from
the inner researches I've made. This man is a skilled manipulator who is
likely to seek to twist the world round his finger by any means. He's the
sort of man who can guarantee his own safety only by staying in power. This
makes him very dangerous, a suitable channel for serious badness. In my
experience, he has no feelings at all not even hate. He seems to have
but cold calculation going on within. If anyone has a different perception,
I'd be intrested to hear it! I'd like to feel compassion and understanding
even toward Milosevic.
In this context, though love and light might be of some therapeutic value, I
have serious doubts in the value of resorting to blanket pacifist statements
and ideals, or in believing that a wacky link-up of good-intentioned souls
would really solve the problem. In my judgement, spiritually or militarily,
this guy probably needs 'taking out' with incisive precision, because of the
disastrous effect he has on other humans. He has the power to bring out the
very worst in both Serbs and their victims. In this context, form your own
conclusions, though I suggest that, if the love'n'light brigade really want
peace, some focused, intense, directed, carefully-conceived innerwork is
needed to neutralise this guy, and divine love-soup, good intentions and
peace-ideology aren't it.
I would add this. If you want to take a simple love-and-light approach, do
start becoming aware of issues at an earlier stage, and do something about
it at the appropriate time, not when it's already too late! This is not
just a matter of stopping gunfire and murder it's a matter of fundamental
peacebuilding and historical problem-solving, from bottom-up. So, may I
suggest that we use this opportunity to scan the world for
problems-in-the-making (of which there are many), and that we get more into
the habit of working on them before they become 'sexy' news-items and
painful disasters for ordinary people?! This involves getting into
deliberate, ongoing world-healing work, and bypassing the Wow-factor of big
dramatic last-minute big-numbers meditations, promoted by highly-regarded
new age stars. Short-termism is part of the problem, not part of the
solution! This involves getting into the boring stuff the healing work we
need to do even when we're uninterested, even when no one is clapping, even
when everyone else is in avoidance and denial. It involves working on
fundamentals for decades. Until the Big Job planet Earth itself, and its
global and historical and cosmic fundamentals is fixed. Which I would
estimate to be a long-haul task with many intricacies to it.
So, go for it with the meditations, and do your best. However,
Bosnia/Kosovo, a decade-long issue, has arisen because everyone turned the
other way and hoped it would all disappear. There's a lesson to be drawn
from this. And while politicians and miliary men are getting it all
demonstrably wrong in Kosovo, this doesn't mean they should down tools, go
home and leave it to prayer. The whole of the Muslim world has been praying
for Bosnia and Kosovo for a long time, and while it's good that
post-Christian new agers are now at last getting on the case, something more
is needed!
Some of the British military people come from my area (SW England). A few
of them are my astrological clients and local acquaintances. One of them
has given me lovely, inspiring rides in a hot-air balloon, for free! They
love their families and care about humanity. They've been in Bosnia, Ulster
and Kurdistan. They're basically good, sincere guys, who believe they're
doing the right thing though they too get frustrated with the management
of the army and with politicians. Don't automatically oppose these guys!
Pray for everyone, on all sides, to see truth and wisdom, even if it's hard,
and to realise and learn from the consequences of their/our actions. If
military intervention happens, watch out that you don't exacerbate problems
by introducing complexity of agendas: pitch your prayers and light-energy
well, non-judgmentally. Who's to say we are right? I don't think 'God'
uses such judgements if 'he' did, planet Earth would have been wiped clean
of humans ages ago! May the Kosovo experience become a deep lesson for the
world, and may those on all sides who have sacrificed their lives in order
to teach us be blessed with the joy of seeing that sacrifice leading to
genuinely, fundamentally wholesome outcomes.
In principle I agree with what your correspondents say about the importance
of social and spiritual peacebuilding and the risk of damage in Kosovo from
military intervention, and the success and value of meditations earlier this
year on Iraq. The suspicions voiced about the shady motivations of the
military-industrial complex are partially correct, in my view, though not
wholly so. I have a reservation about the statement that military
intervention is 'bad' and meditation is 'good', and I think a few blanket
statements are being made which need re-evaluating.
Paldywan Kenobi'sarchive of 1990s articles |
![]() |
© Palden Jenkins, 1992-1997. All of these articles are copyright. They may individually be copied and shared with others in a spirit of knowledge-sharing and fair play, but they may not be sold, printed or reproduced in quantity or changed in form without the permission of the copyright holder. Magazine and other editors may e-mail me for permission to reprint. E-mail: